Why is Tor implemented in the C programming language? Was that decision a matter of luck or taste of Tor's inventors? Are there any advantages of implementing this kind of technology in C?
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
It's a complicated question.
The main reason is historical. When we started out, Roger was only really comfortable in C and Perl. I knew more languages, but I didn't join Tor as a serious contributor until Roger had already been working on the project for a while. (Even if I had been doing as much of the initial work as Roger did, I'm still not sure I would have gone with something else. Back in 2002, Java wasn't so mature, and .)
That said: in my opinion, there are some parts of a program like Tor that you really must implement in C or some other compiled low level language. I'm thinking of cryptography in particular: in order to do fast, safe, efficient cryptography, you really need access to the CPU instruction set. (Some people would argue that C is too high-level for good cryptography, and all crypto should be done in assembly.)
But that doesn't mean that C is the best implementation language for all of Tor today. I'd prefer to move to an architecture where only the core networking module and a bit of glue code would be implemented in C, and the rest would run sandboxed in other processes, written in more high-level memory-safe languages.
