0

Are there any intrinsic risks in visiting an URL following the syntax "http://www.foo.com" rather than an URL following the syntax "http://foo.onion", all other things being equal?

If not, why are there ".onion" URLs instead of just ".com" URLs? Is it simply to hide the web-service from non Tor users?

1

The .onion domain url makes the connection encrypted end-to-end, but the .com domain is routed to\from a exit node, so it's the exit node that has the risk of abuse and so on. So - the onion domain is in a way more secure, but all in all it's considered safe either way.

1

If you use a public domain name registrar, they may choose to route your web site to a third party, if for example, they are forced to do so by someone (under duress, court order, law enforcement request, or some less legitimate reason)

With an .onion domain nobody can seize it, as there is no way to impersonate your private key. There is no registrar to corrupt or force.

0

why are there ".onion" URLs [...] Is it simply to hide the web-service from non Tor users?

Anyone can be a Tor user, so hiding from non Tor users won't work.

It is mainly to hide the location (IP address) of the server, as part of hiding the identity of the owner. Not just from non Tor users but from everyone. (And as Harry Seventyone wrote, .onion 'domains' can not be tampered with by registrars.)

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.