What if any are the (dis)advantages - with respect to speed, anonymity, secrecy... - in using bridges and obfuscated transports from such places where access to plain Tor relays is NOT blocked nor forbidden ? Unrelated to that other question (#13575), I'm asking here for a comparison of using bridges (and optionally obfuscated transports) wrt connecting to a regular entry relay, i.e. not a bridge.


1 Answer 1


Well, an advantage can be the lesser detectability of your connection/session. Disadvantage is that you must encomplicate the relay descriptor to flag the relay "as the one using obfuscation" and which one. It's a good research line, but in a plain context it's hardly useful

  • I would think more processing power used (maybe wasted) as a disadvantage of using transports. Also, aren't bridges a limited resource that using without a need would be a net waste ?
    – Noino O
    Feb 13, 2017 at 12:17
  • bridges are semi-useful in cases when you can work without them, but some specific cases may require their usage even in such a cases. CPU power is not wasted in case of pluggable transports: everything has it's resource costs, including privacy increase provided by pluggable transports
    – Alexey Vesnin
    Feb 14, 2017 at 4:50
  • 1
    I don't think bridges are a limited resource. Due to the nature of bridges, many of them probably don't see much traffic. I don't believe it would be a net waste, but you might have a slower connection since bridges often have less bandwidth than guards. Feb 17, 2017 at 17:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.