Skip to main content
Tor

Return to Question

added 150 characters in body
Source Link
PacoBell
PacoBell
  • 71
  • 1
  • 4

So I downloaded the new signing key with Key-ID 0x58ACD84F. However, the detatched signature file for Tails 1.3.2 seems to be signed with Key-ID 0x752A3DB6 and I can't seem to find that particular key mentioned anywhere on the website. It does show up on the keyservers, though. Is that the old one? Should I trust it?

Edit: I see now that 0x752A3DB6 is a subkey of 0x58ACD84F. Why would Kleopatra claim there's "Not enough information to check signature validity"?

So I downloaded the new signing key with Key-ID 0x58ACD84F. However, the detatched signature file for Tails 1.3.2 seems to be signed with Key-ID 0x752A3DB6 and I can't seem to find that particular key mentioned anywhere on the website. It does show up on the keyservers, though. Is that the old one? Should I trust it?

So I downloaded the new signing key with Key-ID 0x58ACD84F. However, the detatched signature file for Tails 1.3.2 seems to be signed with Key-ID 0x752A3DB6 and I can't seem to find that particular key mentioned anywhere on the website. It does show up on the keyservers, though. Is that the old one? Should I trust it?

Edit: I see now that 0x752A3DB6 is a subkey of 0x58ACD84F. Why would Kleopatra claim there's "Not enough information to check signature validity"?

Source Link
PacoBell
PacoBell
  • 71
  • 1
  • 4

Tails signature mismatch

So I downloaded the new signing key with Key-ID 0x58ACD84F. However, the detatched signature file for Tails 1.3.2 seems to be signed with Key-ID 0x752A3DB6 and I can't seem to find that particular key mentioned anywhere on the website. It does show up on the keyservers, though. Is that the old one? Should I trust it?