Timeline for Why isn't there any such option - middle-relay behind NAT?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2013 at 14:44 | answer | added | adrelanos | timeline score: 4 | |
| S Oct 7, 2013 at 2:08 | history | suggested | Peter Mortensen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Copy edited.
|
| Oct 6, 2013 at 11:49 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 7, 2013 at 2:08 | |||||
| Oct 6, 2013 at 8:46 | comment | added | mirimir | Make that "... perhaps alluded to ...". | |
| Oct 6, 2013 at 8:24 | comment | added | mirimir | Please clarify the question. Are you asking whether middle relays could operate as hidden services, and be found using their .onion addresses? There's more than a little recursion problem there, in that you'd need working circuits to create circuits with hidden services. And there's also the problem, alluded to by Peter Palfrader aka weasel, that this would vastly reduce the cost of attacks. | |
| Oct 5, 2013 at 21:29 | history | edited | perpetuity | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 388 characters in body
|
| Oct 5, 2013 at 11:37 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackTor/status/386454996096917504 | ||
| Oct 5, 2013 at 8:18 | answer | added | weasel - Peter Palfrader | timeline score: 5 | |
| Oct 5, 2013 at 8:09 | history | edited | perpetuity | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 105 characters in body
|
| Oct 5, 2013 at 7:54 | answer | added | mrphs | timeline score: 3 | |
| Oct 5, 2013 at 7:40 | comment | added | mrphs | It's much better if you only ask one questions each time. open another question for "What is the lowest bandwidth rate limit required for a normal middle relay?" part perhaps? | |
| Oct 5, 2013 at 7:16 | history | asked | perpetuity | CC BY-SA 3.0 |