Timeline for Signal NEWNYM vs Stream isolation
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2020 at 10:30 | comment | added | nopara73 | May I ask what's your problem with Bitcoin mixing? | |
| Jan 6, 2018 at 1:09 | vote | accept | nopara73 | ||
| Jan 5, 2018 at 4:27 | comment | added | cacahuatl | rofl. bitcoin mixing. okay. im done. | |
| Jan 5, 2018 at 1:53 | answer | added | nopara73 | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 5, 2018 at 1:12 | comment | added | nopara73 |
I'd argue writing fast software where the bottleneck is NEWNYM rate limiting means I'm doing something right:) If you take a look at this video, there is a NEWNYM from ConnectionConfirmation to OutputRegistration, then another one at OutputRegistration to Signing. This Signing phase takes longer, because of rate limiting. But when multiple rounds are being conducted, which is always the case, the OutputRegistration phase will slow down from rate limiting, too to the slowest user. Stream isolation can achieve about 50% speed increase. youtube.com/watch?v=wjDUJeo4Nu8&t=495s
|
|
| Jan 5, 2018 at 0:16 | comment | added | cacahuatl |
I'd argue that if you're hitting some limitation on NEWNYM then you're doing something wrong in your approach to solving the problem.
|
|
| Jan 4, 2018 at 9:47 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackTor/status/948853267005616128 | ||
| Jan 3, 2018 at 7:09 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 4, 2018 at 5:36 | |||||
| Jan 3, 2018 at 7:08 | history | asked | nopara73 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |