Timeline for Can I prevent Tor from building single-hop circuits?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:59 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://tor.stackexchange.com/ with https://tor.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jan 26, 2017 at 11:10 | comment | added | cacahuatl | Read my answer. Tor uses single hops for specific cases where anonymity is not required and cannot be achieved. | |
| Jan 24, 2017 at 5:20 | comment | added | agd | To repeat {with grammar and highlighting changes for clarification}: WHY DO THOSE OTHER POTENTIAL CANDIDATES CHECK IN AGAIN LATER, AND [create] "Built" ONE-HOP CIRCUITS? [i.e. completed after only one-hop] | |
| Jan 24, 2017 at 5:18 | comment | added | agd |
Please note that I am differentiating between circuits whose "Status" in Onion Circuits is labelled as "Launched" {first hop}; "Extended" {second hop}, and "Built" {Normally the third hop, BUT SOMETIMES ALSO ONE-HOPS}. [Circuit progress can be viewed by entering systemctl restart tor as root, and watching "Status".] As stated above: those circuits which I find objectionable/questionable are those one-hops whose "Status" is "Built", which appear at intervals during a given session [with no intervening restart].
|
|
| Dec 23, 2016 at 4:05 | history | answered | cacahuatl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |