Timeline for How to map public static IP addresses to Hidden Services?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2020 at 8:24 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Aug 23, 2016 at 9:27 | history | edited | cacahuatl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 507 characters in body
|
| Aug 23, 2016 at 8:17 | comment | added | Renne | @canonizing ironize From the view of pure TOR it's bad, of course. We want to create a network of TOR nodes but we still need access for clearnet users. The plan is to use TLS for the clearnet-users and validate the TLS-certificates with DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities. That way at least the content is protected for the clearnet users. We will encourage clearnet-users to run their own TOR node, of course. Currently this approach is definitely better than clearnet only. ;-) Is a "TransPort"-Statement necessar | |
| Aug 22, 2016 at 4:34 | comment | added | cacahuatl | Because the incoming connection isn't protected at all. | |
| Aug 22, 2016 at 4:06 | comment | added | SuperSluether | For the sake of being complete, why is this a bad idea? | |
| Aug 22, 2016 at 0:08 | history | answered | cacahuatl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |