Timeline for What is the point of a relay family?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2020 at 8:24 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jun 10, 2016 at 21:32 | history | edited | cacahuatl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
typo
|
| Jun 10, 2016 at 8:48 | comment | added | dummydev | Point 2: it covers law enforcement but what about government agencies (NSA and its offspring in the western world)? We can assume them to spy on whoever they want without never having to speak to a judge.How are those attacks different from Mallory just deploying a bunch of secretly related relays (or from Eve eavesdropping on a random bunch of relays) and working from there? | |
| Jun 10, 2016 at 8:48 | comment | added | dummydev | Thanks, however I only get your third point yet: I understand how public families can be used as a statistics tool, but not how they increase security and/or anonymity. Tor is not about trusting individuals but the random circuit. That means all relays could be compromised but it holds as long as they don't coordinate, right? Point 1: you might indeed be coerced by rubber and hose but this is also the case if you operate, say a single exit node with a high throughput. | |
| Jun 9, 2016 at 16:17 | history | answered | cacahuatl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |