Timeline for Why do Tor hidden service operators bother with SSL/TLS encryption?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2016 at 23:24 | history | migrated | from deepweb.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| May 22, 2016 at 18:11 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| May 22, 2016 at 18:09 | comment | added | Alexey Vesnin♦ | @BenN Tor's encryption is a transport. Like clearnet routing. And yes - it can be also "played with", even discarded in case of all four chain members are malicious nodes, but even in that case a HTTPS on your side ensures you of MitM-resistance even in this bad screinario | |
| May 22, 2016 at 17:57 | comment | added | Ben N | Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but doesn't the existing Tor encryption already provide integrity and anti-MitM? Client accounting is a good point, though, I forgot about that. | |
| May 22, 2016 at 17:53 | history | answered | Alexey Vesnin♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |